Supreme Court Issues stay on execution drugs grounds

Sunday, April 23, 2006
Top U.S. court to consider appeal on last-minute challenges to injection executions
By RON WORD Associated Press Writer
(AP) - JACKSONVILLE, Florida-Convicted killer Clarence Hill was already strapped to a gurney with IV tubes running into his arms to deliver the lethal injection. The executioner was ready for the order to start the flow of drugs, and witnesses including both his family and relatives of the slain police officer were waiting.
But at the last minute, Hill was granted a stay of execution by the U.S. Supreme Court.

On Wednesday, the top U.S. court will hear Hill's appeal, using his case to clarify how inmates may bring deadline challenges to the use of lethal injection and whether his challenge can be filed as a civil rights action.
How the court rules could decide whether Hill will be executed this summer or whether he will be allowed to challenge Florida's use of lethal injection as cruel and unusual punishment - a ruling that could halt executions in Florida and perhaps elsewhere, at least temporarily.
Hill's stay of execution also halted the death of another Florida inmate on the same grounds, and Governor Jeb Bush, a brother of President George W. Bush, said he would not sign any other death warrants until Hill's case is settled.
Hill's stay also is directly responsible for execution delays in three more cases in other states, said Rion Dennis, a spokesman for the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington.
Carolyn Snurkowski, a death appeals lawyer in the state attorney general's office, will argue that Hill cannot challenge Florida's method of execution through a civil rights action. She also argues he filed his claim against lethal injection too late, since he waited until just before his scheduled execution on Jan. 24.
"The fact that it was delayed doesn't make it right now," Snurkowski said.
Hill's lawyer, D. Todd Doss, argues that the doses of drugs used in Florida executions can cause pain, in violation of the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
Hill was convicted of killing Pensacola police Officer Stephen Taylor in 1982.
Taylor, 26, and Officer Larry Bailly had gone to investigate a silent alarm at a bank in downtown Pensacola, and caught Hill's partner, Cliff Jackson, outside the bank. As the officers attempted to handcuff Jackson, Hill came up from behind, killing Taylor and wounding Bailly. Hill was shot five times. Jackson was sentenced to life in prison.
Bailly, who is retired, did not respond to a request for comment made through the Pensacola Police Department.
Hill also has claimed he should not be executed since he is mentally retarded. That argument was rejected by the state Supreme Court, which noted that a mental evaluation showed his IQ was 16 points higher than the standard of 70 or below.
Taylor's family is growing weary after 24 years of delays, said his older brother, Jack Taylor. They want Hill dead and they were angry when his execution was halted.
"If they want me to, I'd put a bullet in his brain," said Taylor, 61, who lives in Pensacola.
"It needs to be done and it needs to be over with," said Linda Knouse, the slain officer's sister.
However, a cousin of Taylor, Gary Mace of Key Largo, was not upset the high court took the case.
"We are willing to see what the courts have to say. I want the Supreme Court to look at this case and make a judicial decision so others won't have to go through what we went through," Mace said.
"It's not going to change anything. Steve will still be dead and is not coming back to us," Mace said.
Hill, 48, did not respond to a request for an interview. His relatives, most of whom live in Mobile, Alabama, did not return messages left on their answering machines.
"He's concerned," Doss said. "His life is at stake. He is not somebody who is an overly emotional person, at least not with me."

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.
Copyright © 1994-2004FindLaw