Criminal Justice News and VIews

Interesting items related to criminal justice

My Photo
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

I love teaching and sharing knowledge. The Internet is a free passage to an amazing amount of knowledge provided by some of the greatest minds of the day. MIT, Oxford and other universities are now sharing lecture notes with the public and allowing us to dip into the overflowing fonts of wisdom that abound. Yale is but one university that has put actual lectures on the web.

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Will we see Cameras in the Supreme Court

Thursday March 30, 2006 9:46 PM


Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Supreme Court hearings could be shown on TV under a bill approved by a Senate committee Thursday but opposed by some high court justices.

Two bills that, if they became law, would allow more federal court proceedings to be televised moved a step forward in the Judiciary Committee.

One, which passed 12-6, would require the Supreme Court to permit television coverage of all open sessions unless a majority of the justices decide that coverage in a particular case would violate the due process rights of a party before the court.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said the Supreme Court becomes a ``super-legislature'' when it decides far-reaching public policy questions, and should make its proceedings more accessible.

``The public has a right to know what the Supreme Court is doing,'' Specter, R-Pa., said.

The proposal, long opposed by some justices and interest groups, gained new life last year when Chief Justice John Roberts said during his confirmation hearing that he would keep an open mind on the question of cameras in courts.

Two sitting justices, Anthony M. Kennedy and Stephen Breyer, and former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, left no doubt about their opposition to cameras in the high court during an American Bar Association event in November.

And several justices have said they were troubled by the televised O.J. Simpson trial a decade ago.

Another sitting justice was more blunt: ``The day you see a camera come into our courtroom it's going to roll over my dead body,'' Justice David Souter told a congressional panel in 1996.

While some states allow some camera coverage of court proceedings, cameras are forbidden in federal district courts. Federal appeals courts have varying policies. Resistance has been stiffest in the Supreme Court, where reporters are prohibited from bringing any recording device into the room where the nine justices hear arguments in about 80 cases a year.

A second bill, sponsored by Judiciary Committee members Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., would allow federal trial and appellate judges to permit cameras in the courtroom. The measure passed the panel 10-6